0.08/0.16 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.16 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 1920 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 240 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 03:56:34 EDT 2025 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.49 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.27/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p 0.30/0.92 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.30/0.92 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHSA. 0.30/0.92 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.30/0.92 # Starting new_bool_8 with 480s (2) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting new_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting additional_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting ehoh_best with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting sh2lt with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting full_lambda_4 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # full_lambda_4 with pid 995 completed with status 0 0.30/0.92 # Result found by full_lambda_4 0.30/0.92 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHSA. 0.30/0.92 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.30/0.92 # Starting new_bool_8 with 480s (2) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting new_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting additional_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting ehoh_best with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting sh2lt with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting full_lambda_4 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,1.5,,2,20000,1.0) 0.30/0.92 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN 0.30/0.92 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.30/0.92 # Starting almost_fo_1 with 130s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # almost_fo_1 with pid 996 completed with status 0 0.30/0.92 # Result found by almost_fo_1 0.30/0.92 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHSA. 0.30/0.92 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.30/0.92 # Starting new_bool_8 with 480s (2) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting new_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting additional_ho_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting ehoh_best with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting sh2lt with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Starting full_lambda_4 with 240s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,1.5,,2,20000,1.0) 0.30/0.92 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN 0.30/0.92 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.30/0.92 # Starting almost_fo_1 with 130s (1) cores 0.30/0.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s 0.30/0.92 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.30/0.92 0.30/0.92 # Proof found! 0.30/0.92 # SZS status Theorem 0.30/0.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_sort1, type, set_a: $tType). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_sort2, type, a: $tType). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_sort3, type, nat: $tType). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_84, type, minus_minus_nat: nat > nat > nat). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_88, type, zero_zero_nat: nat). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_89, type, suc: nat > nat). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_95, type, ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_97, type, ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_113, type, member_a: a > set_a > $o). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_116, type, h1: set_a). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_120, type, g: nat > a). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_121, type, h2: a). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_122, type, m2: nat). 0.30/0.92 thf(decl_125, type, xa: nat). 0.30/0.92 thf(conj_1, hypothesis, ![X11:nat]:((![X12:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X12 @ m2)=>(((g @ X11)=(g @ X12))=>((X11)=(X12)))))<=(ord_less_eq_nat @ X11 @ m2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', conj_1)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_184_less__or__eq__imp__le, axiom, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:((((ord_less_nat @ X20 @ X21)|((X20)=(X21)))=>(ord_less_eq_nat @ X20 @ X21))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_184_less__or__eq__imp__le)). 0.30/0.92 thf(conj_21, conjecture, (member_a @ (g @ xa) @ h1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', conj_21)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_196_not__less__eq, axiom, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:((~((ord_less_nat @ X20 @ X21))<=>(ord_less_nat @ X21 @ (suc @ X20)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_196_not__less__eq)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_238_less__Suc__eq__le, axiom, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X20 @ (suc @ X21))<=>(ord_less_eq_nat @ X20 @ X21))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_238_less__Suc__eq__le)). 0.30/0.92 thf(conj_3, hypothesis, ((g @ m2)=(h2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', conj_3)). 0.30/0.92 thf(conj_20, hypothesis, (((g @ xa)=(h2))|(member_a @ (g @ xa) @ h1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', conj_20)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_222_less__imp__diff__less, axiom, ![X2:nat, X3:nat, X21:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X2 @ X21) @ X3)<=(ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_222_less__imp__diff__less)). 0.30/0.92 thf(conj_19, hypothesis, (ord_less_eq_nat @ xa @ (minus_minus_nat @ m2 @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', conj_19)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_147_nat__neq__iff, axiom, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:((((X20)!=(X21))<=>((ord_less_nat @ X21 @ X20)|(ord_less_nat @ X20 @ X21)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_147_nat__neq__iff)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_254_diff__less__Suc, axiom, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X20 @ X21) @ (suc @ X20))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_254_diff__less__Suc)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_138_n__not__Suc__n, axiom, ![X21:nat]:(((X21)!=(suc @ X21))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_138_n__not__Suc__n)). 0.30/0.92 thf(fact_38_Suc__pred, axiom, ![X21:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X21)=>((suc @ (minus_minus_nat @ X21 @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat)))=(X21)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', fact_38_Suc__pred)). 0.30/0.92 thf(conj_16, hypothesis, (ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ m2), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WtDiOdPguN/E---3.1_896.p', conj_16)). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_14, hypothesis, ![X11:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X11 @ m2)=>![X12:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X12 @ m2)=>(((g @ X11)=(g @ X12))=>((X11)=(X12))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conj_1])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X824:nat, X825:nat]:(((~(ord_less_nat @ X824 @ X825)|(ord_less_eq_nat @ X824 @ X825))&(((X824)!=(X825))|(ord_less_eq_nat @ X824 @ X825)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_184_less__or__eq__imp__le])])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~(member_a @ (g @ xa) @ h1), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_21])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:((~(ord_less_nat @ X20 @ X21)<=>(ord_less_nat @ X21 @ (suc @ X20)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_196_not__less__eq])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_18, hypothesis, ![X817:nat, X818:nat]:((~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X817 @ m2)|(~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X818 @ m2)|(((g @ X817)!=(g @ X818))|((X817)=(X818)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X2)|((X1)!=(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ~(member_a @ (g @ xa) @ h1), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X1014:nat, X1015:nat]:((((ord_less_nat @ X1014 @ X1015)|(ord_less_nat @ X1015 @ (suc @ X1014)))&(~(ord_less_nat @ X1015 @ (suc @ X1014))|~(ord_less_nat @ X1014 @ X1015)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X1012:nat, X1013:nat]:(((~(ord_less_nat @ X1012 @ (suc @ X1013))|(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1012 @ X1013))&(~(ord_less_eq_nat @ X1012 @ X1013)|(ord_less_nat @ X1012 @ (suc @ X1013))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_238_less__Suc__eq__le])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_23, hypothesis, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:((((X1)=(X2))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ m2))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ m2))|((g @ X1)!=(g @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_24, hypothesis, ((g @ m2)=(h2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X1:nat]:((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X1)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_26, hypothesis, (((g @ xa)=(h2))|(member_a @ (g @ xa) @ h1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_20])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ~((member_a @ (g @ xa) @ h1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:((~((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (suc @ X2)))|~((ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (suc @ X2))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X2:nat, X3:nat, X21:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X3)=>(ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X2 @ X21) @ X3))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_222_less__imp__diff__less])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_31, hypothesis, ![X1:nat]:((((X1)=(m2))|((g @ X1)!=(h2))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ m2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_25])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_32, hypothesis, ((g @ xa)=(h2)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X2)|~((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (suc @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X2)|(ord_less_nat @ X2 @ (suc @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:((~((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X2))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_36, hypothesis, (ord_less_eq_nat @ xa @ (minus_minus_nat @ m2 @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_19])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X1217:nat, X1218:nat, X1219:nat]:((~(ord_less_nat @ X1217 @ X1218)|(ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1217 @ X1219) @ X1218))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_38, hypothesis, (((m2)=(xa))|~((ord_less_eq_nat @ xa @ m2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X2)|(ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_40, hypothesis, ~((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ m2 @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat)) @ xa)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_36])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X1:nat, X3:nat, X2:nat]:(((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1 @ X3) @ X2)|~((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_42, hypothesis, (((m2)=(xa))|(ord_less_nat @ m2 @ xa)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_43, hypothesis, ~((ord_less_nat @ m2 @ xa)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X20:nat, X21:nat]:((((X20)!=(X21))<=>((ord_less_nat @ X21 @ X20)|(ord_less_nat @ X20 @ X21)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_147_nat__neq__iff])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X1224:nat, X1225:nat]:((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1224 @ X1225) @ (suc @ X1224))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_254_diff__less__Suc])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_46, hypothesis, ((m2)=(xa)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_43])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_47, plain, ![X998:nat, X999:nat]:(((((X998)=(X999))|((ord_less_nat @ X999 @ X998)|(ord_less_nat @ X998 @ X999)))&((~(ord_less_nat @ X999 @ X998)|((X998)!=(X999)))&(~(ord_less_nat @ X998 @ X999)|((X998)!=(X999)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_48, plain, ![X2:nat, X1:nat]:((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1 @ X2) @ (suc @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_49, plain, ![X21:nat]:(((X21)!=(suc @ X21))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_138_n__not__Suc__n])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X1204:nat]:((~(ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1204)|((suc @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1204 @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat)))=(X1204)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_38_Suc__pred])])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_51, hypothesis, ~((ord_less_nat @ (minus_minus_nat @ xa @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat)) @ xa)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_46])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_52, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:((((X1)=(X2))|(ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X1)|(ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_53, plain, ![X1:nat, X2:nat]:(~((ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_48])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_54, hypothesis, (ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ m2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_16])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_55, plain, ![X1287:nat]:(((X1287)!=(suc @ X1287))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_49])])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_56, plain, ![X1:nat]:((((suc @ (minus_minus_nat @ X1 @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat)))=(X1))|~((ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_57, hypothesis, ((minus_minus_nat @ xa @ (suc @ zero_zero_nat))=(xa)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51, c_0_52]), c_0_53])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_58, hypothesis, (ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ xa), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54, c_0_46])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_59, plain, ![X1:nat]:(((X1)!=(suc @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_55])). 0.30/0.92 thf(c_0_60, hypothesis, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56, c_0_57]), c_0_58])]), c_0_59]), ['proof']). 0.30/0.92 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.30/0.92 # Parsed axioms : 493 0.30/0.92 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 276 0.30/0.92 # Initial clauses : 340 0.30/0.92 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.30/0.92 # Initial clauses in saturation : 336 0.30/0.92 # Processed clauses : 1315 0.30/0.92 # ...of these trivial : 59 0.30/0.92 # ...subsumed : 579 0.30/0.92 # ...remaining for further processing : 677 0.30/0.92 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 58 0.30/0.92 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.30/0.92 # Backward-subsumed : 10 0.30/0.92 # Backward-rewritten : 57 0.30/0.92 # Generated clauses : 3196 0.30/0.92 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2743 0.30/0.92 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.30/0.92 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.30/0.92 # Paramodulations : 3123 0.30/0.92 # Factorizations : 4 0.30/0.92 # NegExts : 0 0.30/0.92 # Equation resolutions : 61 0.30/0.92 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.30/0.92 # Total rewrite steps : 916 0.30/0.92 # ...of those cached : 798 0.30/0.92 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.30/0.92 # Propositional check models : 0 0.30/0.92 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.30/0.92 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.30/0.92 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.30/0.92 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.30/0.92 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.30/0.92 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.30/0.92 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.30/0.92 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.30/0.92 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.30/0.92 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.30/0.92 # Current number of processed clauses : 316 0.30/0.92 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 79 0.30/0.92 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3 0.30/0.92 # Negative unit clauses : 37 0.30/0.92 # Non-unit-clauses : 197 0.30/0.92 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1936 0.30/0.92 # ...number of literals in the above : 5187 0.30/0.92 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.30/0.92 # Current number of archived clauses : 332 0.30/0.92 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26377 0.30/0.92 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18916 0.30/0.92 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 257 0.30/0.92 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1814 0.30/0.92 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.30/0.92 # BW rewrite match attempts : 61 0.30/0.92 # BW rewrite match successes : 23 0.30/0.92 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.30/0.92 # Condensation successes : 0 0.30/0.92 # Termbank termtop insertions : 71457 0.30/0.92 # Search garbage collected termcells : 9845 0.30/0.92 0.30/0.92 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.30/0.92 # User time : 0.118 s 0.30/0.92 # System time : 0.007 s 0.30/0.92 # Total time : 0.125 s 0.30/0.92 # Maximum resident set size: 3868 pages 0.30/0.92 0.30/0.92 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.30/0.92 # User time : 0.132 s 0.30/0.92 # System time : 0.012 s 0.30/0.92 # Total time : 0.143 s 0.30/0.92 # Maximum resident set size: 2568 pages 0.30/0.92 % E exiting 0.30/0.92 % E exiting 0.30/0.92 EOF